Example of a nursing research analysis paper
Teacher ENG 5 July Critiquing nursing research Through the Nursing and Midwifery Council NMC code of professional conduct NMC, nurses supply high standards of care go here patients and clients. One code nurses adhere to is clause 6 which pronounces nurses must maintain professional knowledge and competence, have a responsibility to deliver pqper based on current evidence, best practice and validated research NMC, This was selected because of the publicity that surrounds hospital acquired infection Barrett, TitleThe framework suggests the title should be concise, informative, clearly specify the content and example of a nursing research analysis paper the research approach.
The title of the paper is concise; however it gives no reserach of content or research subject. This may indicate here the authors have not used a standard format which Benton states reports should follow; nevertheless the title captured more info imagination of the reader reswarch warrants further reading.
The qualifications and experiences of the authors are not documented.
If a sample was selected, is the method of selecting the sample clearly described? Are the data in each table and figure described in the resarch Therefore the reader believes this paper does not establish contamination from case notes, so is unreliable and lacks validity. Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for? Are recommendations for future action made? Clinical placement is often considered an essential aspect of nursing education and an invaluable way to prepare students example of a nursing research analysis paper the reality of nursing. Are the control procedures described? Sample Concept Analysis Paper Sample Database Searches Here are some videos of sample searches in some commonly used databases.
This could indicate the authors have no relevant qualifications exapmle experiences in this field. However further reading identifies where the authors work which could be relevant to their subject, although there is no indication of their occupation. AbstractThe framework states an abstract should be included, should identify the research problem, state the hypotheses, outline the methodology, give details of the sample subjects and report major findings.
The abstract is included and is outlined which makes it distinctive and captures the attention. Burns and Grove states this helps to influence the reader to read the remainder of the report. Additionally a distinctive abstract is beneficial for a example of a nursing research analysis paper exaample Parahoo, The search question is included and is noticed immediately on the first line. Also incorporated are the methodology, sample subjects and major findings.
Yet they do not state the hypothesis.
The abstract is clear and precise which gives the reader belief in the capability of the researches. IntroductionThe framework wnalysis the introduction should clearly identify the problem, include a rationale and state any limitations. The problem is identifiable and the rational is included, nevertheless the reader would have liked to see these presented earlier in the xnalysis. Literature reviewThe, framework indicates the literature review should be current, identify the underlying theoretical framework, produce a balanced evaluation of material and to look for absent analydis.
Although the reference from is outdated it is reasonable the authors included it since it is the only research exampoe found on their particular subject. However this causes the reader to speculate the reason this subject was studied. However it is wondered if other researches believed case notes were irrelevant compared to other objects in the hospital or if this is ground exakple research.
Improvement could have been made by the authors including the search engines they had used as this would allow replication and evaluation of the paper. The literature the authors cited used a quantitative approach as did the authors themselves thus identifying and employing the underlying theoretical framework and giving credibility to the paper. This suggests the researches appear to have only reported the finding of other studies and not examined the material, which, Peat states is essential for making decisions about whether or not to change practice on the basis of published report.
Following duplication of the researches literature search using their keywords the reader could find no important references omitted which leads to the belief that they performed the search methodically. Nursing it was discovered that one important reference in the text Semmelweis had been omitted in the reference list. This leads the reader to question if other things may also have been omitted resulting in an unsound paper.
The hypothesisThe framework asks if the hypothesis is capable of testing and if the hypothesis is unambiguous. There is no hypothesis in the paper only a research question.
Cormack states that hypothesis make my essay sound better generator honda only be stated for studies which predict a relationship between two variables. Since the authors do not state an expectation of the outcome they did not need to incorporate a hypothesis.
This could suggest an understanding of research giving the reader faith in their capabilities. Operational definitionsThe framework suggests the terms used in example of a nursing research analysis paper research problem should be clearly defined. Nevertheless they are very limited in respect of the paper and the reader speculated how they found eleven of the twelve references using the keywords since they related to other objects. The reader searched Blackwell Synergy using own keywords such nursijg hospital equipment, contamination and bacteria.
Many more articles were discovered indicating the nutsing did not perform an adequate literature search. MethodologyThe framework indicates that the methodology should clearly state example of a nursing research analysis paper research approach, appropriate to the research problem and if strengths and weaknesses are noted. Although the authors do not identify the study as quantitative the reader understands that it is since it uses findings that can be measured and deals with quantity of results as opposed to interpretation Munhall, Additionally the reader believed it is a analysis paper study since the authors looked at cross infection and objects in wxample hospital nursinh and narrowed it down to cross infection and case notes.
No strengths or analyss were acknowledged, which, Byrne states is needed so the reader can ascertain if the research is valid. Furthermore the authors state they sampled the spine of the case notes because this is where most hand contact occurs while reading them, however perhaps it could have been suggested sampling the inside since in, my experience, reseach is where most hand contact occurs. However the Department of health state before and after patient contact hands should be washed, paler the validity of their approach is questionable. Finally the reader would have liked the researches to explain why the notes were incubated at 37 degrees since an assumption could be made that they are simulating a hospital environment.
In this paper there are no subjects only case notes. Sample selectionThe framework suggests the selection approach is congruent to the methodology, clearly stated and if sample reseagch is clearly stated. Since the sample selection method is visit web page, it may have been inappropriate, denoting further flaws which affect the remainder of the paper.
The sample size is clearly stated however but should have been included in the methodology giving the reader a reference when reading it. Data collectionThe framework asks if the data collection procedures are adequately described. The authors describe the data collection procedure as recorded and analysed. This gives the reader no understanding of how the data was collected, who document it, who interpreted it and where it was stored.
This could have implications on the results since there may have been weaknesses in these article source such as the reliability of the collection tools, if the people who recorded and analysis it had training and if there could there be any contamination oc the notes.
Ethical considerationsThe framework asks if the study involves humans has the study received ethics committee approval, if informed consent was sought, if confidentiality was assured and anonymity guaranteed.
The hypothesisThe framework asks if the hypothesis is capable of testing and if the hypothesis is unambiguous. The reader nrsing Blackwell Synergy using own keywords such as hospital equipment, contamination and bacteria. Burns and Grove example of a nursing research analysis paper this helps to influence the reader to read the remainder of the report. Literature reviewThe, framework indicates the literature review should be current, identify the underlying theoretical framework, produce a balanced evaluation of material and to look for absent references. Elcoat adds evidence-based practice and evidence-based nursing have very strong positions in the Clinical Governance agenda of quality improvement. Retrieved July 5,from http: The discussion is not balanced since it focus upon the findings of pathogenic bacteria on case notes and subsequently formulates assumptions about MRSA surviving on case notes without research to back this up.
Cormack, Royal college of physicians, The authors make no reference these three ethical codes so it is unknown if the patients agreed to their case notes being tested. This implies no consideration of ethical issues from the authors and questions what other considerations they have overlooked. ResultsAccording to the framework the results should be clearly presented, internally consistent, have sufficient detail to enable the reader to judge, and asks how much confidence can be placed in the finding. However the table appears complex, confusing and impossible to understand; therefore the reader would question the internal consistency.
Deliver research paper a nursing of example analysis writing company
Researcy addition since the results are difficult to interpret the reader can not judge the reliability of the findings. Data analysisThe framework states the approach should be appropriate to the type of data collected, statistical analysis should be correctly performed, should be sufficient analysis to decide papre significant differences are not caused by differences in other relevant variables and if the complete information is reported.
The authors approach was appropriate to the type of data collected since no other approach would be suitable. Nevertheless the researches do not state how they analysed the statistics so the reader can not judge any limitations. DiscussionThe framework states the discussion should be balanced, drawn on previous research, weaknesses of the study acknowledged and clinical example of a nursing research analysis paper discussed.
Will our paper analysis research a nursing of example the healthy
The discussion is not balanced since it focus upon the findings of pathogenic bacteria on case notes and subsequently formulates assumptions about MRSA surviving on case notes without research to back this up. It vaguely draws upon the only previous research and mentions the result, which contradicts their own findings. ConclusionThe framework asks if the conclusions are supported by the results obtained. The conclusion the authors established was the possibility of transferring bacteria, however since the example of a nursing research analysis paper are indecipherable it is impossible to determine if the conclusions are supported by the results.
A of research analysis paper example nursing was comparatively
RecommendationThe framework states the recommendations should suggest further areas for research, and identify how any weaknesses in the analysiw design could be avoided in future read more. There is no suggestion for further research; no weaknesses in the study design mentioned and no recommendations on how issues can be avoided. Therefore the reader believes this paper does not establish contamination from rfsearch notes, so is unreliable and lacks validity.
Application to practiceThe Department of Health states Clinical governance ezample the system through which National Health Service organisations are accountable for continuously anaoysis the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care. Elcoat adds evidence-based practice examplw evidence-based nursing have very strong positions in the Clinical Governance agenda of quality improvement. Before knowing how to critique I did not understand why nurses had to review articles and I would have taken them on face value, however since critiquing this article I exam;le realized it is a very important part of my practice and taking articles on face value is unsafe practice.
The authors discussed some important issues concerning cross infection anapysis as a consequence I have reflected more on cross infection in my clinical area. This leads me to believe that every research paper is of value and click to see more something to give to the reader.
- The title of the paper is concise; however it gives no information of content or research subject.
- The conclusion the authors established was the possibility of transferring bacteria, however since the results are indecipherable it is impossible to determine if the conclusions are supported by the results.
- We recommend connecting the term for your concept with any of these search terms using the Boolean operator AND.
References BarrettS. Medicine Publishing Company,33 3i-iii.
Fring research example analysis nursing a paper of delivery guaranteed
Retrieved July 5,from http: Journal of Hospital Infection. Reviewing and evaluating the literature. The research process in nursing 4th ed. Writing an integrative review. Association ofpreoperative Registered Nurses Journal. Understanding nursing research 3rd ed.
M A Healthcare Limited. Journal of Naalysis Infections 47 suppl: Retrieved July 12, ,fromhttp: Clinical Governance in action: Jones reesearch Bartlett Publishers. Code of professional conduct. Health science research; a handbook of quantitative methods.